patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Fairfax Officials to Vote on Silver Line Tuesday

Public hearings on fiscal year 2013 budget, tax rate and potential movement on county executive search during the April 10 Board of Supervisors meeting.

 

The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors will vote Tuesday on the county’s participation in Phase II of the Dulles Metrorail project.

Anthony Griffin, who will retire as county executive later this month, is recommending the board confirm its participation in the project while remaining vigilant in its pursuit of additional funding for the $2.7 billion extension. Failure to participate could mean significant changes to the direction of the project.

Some Fairfax County residents think the project is too expensive, and are worried about drastic increases on the Dulles Toll Road, which is funding much of the project.

The Virginia State Senate included $300 million in its budget specifically for Metrorail, but the Washington Post reports the money was removed during budget negotiations this past weekend.

The board will also vote on the approval of recommended station names for the names of Silver Line stations coming to Fairfax County. Residents deemed previously recommended names too confusing, so the county opened the matter up for public input and received more than 16,000 survey responses about station names.

Planning Name Previous Recommendation Staff Recommendation
Tysons East Tysons East-McLean McLean
Tysons Central 123 Tysons I & II Tysons Corner
Tysons Central 7 Tysons Central Greensboro Park
Tysons West Tysons-Spring Hill Road Spring Hill
Wiehle Avenue Reston-Wiehle Avenue Wiehle-Reston East
Reston Parkway Reston Town Center Reston Town Center
Herndon-Monroe Herndon-Reston West Herndon
Route 28 Herndon-Dulles East

Innovation

County Fiscal Year 2013 Budget

Tuesday afternoon, the board will hold a public hearing on the fiscal year 2013 budget and a separate hearing on the effective tax rate increase. (A video Q&A with Griffin on his proposed budget is available in the media box above.)

The current rate is $1.07 per $100 assessed value, but the county has been advertising an increase of one cent to $1.08.

The tax rate hearing is scheduled for 3:30 p.m. and the budget hearing is scheduled for 6 p.m. Tuesday. Two more budget hearings are scheduled for 3 p.m. Wednesday and Thursday in the Board Auditorium in Fairfax County Government Center.

Patch will be at this week's board meeting and will also be covering all public hearings live, so be sure to check back for full coverage throughout this week.

Is the County Executive Search Over?

Finally, the Washington Post reported Saturday the board has settled on a successor for Griffin come his retirement at the end of April. According to a document obtained by the Post, the board plans to appoint Edward Long Jr., a former deputy county executive and chief financial officer, and could do so as early as the Tuesday meeting.

Board Chairman Sharon Bulova would not confirm or deny the reports, according to the Post.

Click here if you wish to speak at any of this week's hearings.

The full agenda for the Fairfax County board's April 10 meeting can be found here.

Related Topics: Fairfax County, Silver Line, and fairfax county budget

Tim Merl

1:32 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

As feared, politics has turned this into a boondoggle.

Reply

Tammi Petrine

1:40 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

We are now at the 11th hour. I am confused as to why the Fairfax Board of Supervisors insists on voting tomorrow on a project that is being majority funded (75%) by a tiny percentage of repeat toll users including all Fairfax Co. citizens of Herndon and Reston who need access to the areas east of their communities.

I will be totally disgusted by our elected Board of Supervisors IF they persist on approving this project with a funding scheme that is abusive of their own citizens as well as our Loudoun neighbors who can not use the Metro. Readers need to know that an audit of this project by the U.S. Dept. of Transportation is in progress and results are imminent yet the BOS rushes to approve it BEFORE the results are known. IS this responsible or intelligent governance? I think not.

Has the county done due diligence to protect its citizens in the corridor from unfair and dangerous tax burdens by a funding "scheme" that is utterly incompetent? I think not.

Has the Reston Association been responsible stewards of Restonians’ best interest by its recent banal statement that it wants Metro to extend into Loudoun Co.? Aside from the fact that MOST of us would like that result as well, must we swallow a poison pill to get it? Does RA not understand the incredible harm that exorbitant tolls will inflict on our community, both residential and commercial? I think not.

Reply

Tammi Petrine

1:40 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

continued:
Have all our elected officials, local, state and federal, done everything in their power to construct a responsible, equitable and sane solution to the funding of the entire Silver Line project? I think not.

Do the citizens who live and work in the Dulles corridor deserve to be shafted like we will be if the BOS rushes to vote “yes” tomorrow, April 10th?
I think NOT.

What do YOU think?

Reply

Bob Bruhns

8:32 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

I think the Fairfax County BOS certainly needs to reschedule any consideration of approval of the Dulles Rail Phase II project until AFTER the US DOT makes the results of its finanicial audit of the project available. I believe that is supposed to happen on May 15, 2012.

I find it very strange that this audit has not been mentioned by our business or political leaders, or reported in the news to this date - because it was made public on March 15, 2012, and it has been under way since the week of March 19, 2012. Then again, probably about 1.5 billion dollars of overcharge are at stake, so I suppose that strange things are to be expected.

From the US DOT:
Audit Initiated of Phase 2 of the Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project
March 15, 2012
Project ID: 12M3001M00
http://www.oig.dot.gov/library-item/5747

Full PDF Document:
http://www.oig.dot.gov/sites/dot/files/Dulles%20Phase%202%20Announcement%20Letter%5E3-19-12.pdf

From this document:
"Our objectives will be to (1) determine whether DOT's proposed oversight role for phase 2 adequately addresses key project risk areas, including cost, schedule, and financing and (2) assess whether MWAA's phase 2 project plans rely upon reasonable assumptions of revenue from the Dulles Toll Road.

We plan to begin this audit next week and will contact your audit liaisons to schedule an entrance conference. We will conduct our work at DOT, MWAA, and other related sites as needed."

Reply

Rob Whitfield

9:22 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Michael Longhi, the Fairfax County Auditor, today indicated that he continues to monitor Phase 1 construction and the potential for cost overruns but the Board has not yet asked him to provide any evaluation of Phase 2 costs and risks. Mr. Longhi in a 2010 report outlined concerns about the failure of the 2009 Dulles Toll Road Traffic and Revenue study by CDM Smith (then known as Wilbur Smith) to properly evaluate potential traffic volume changes which will result from the advent of rail. I suggest strongly that the Fairfax County Board defer action on Phase 2 and ask Mr. Longhi to investigate the Phase 2 issues and report to the Board within the next 60 days.

There has never been a public process, hearing or referendum to evaluate and approve a change in the Dulles Rail capital funding plan from the one outlined in the 2004 Final Environmental Impact Statement. Consider, how would residents of Fairfax, Annandale and Springfield react if, without a public hearing, the Board approved at the behest of an unelected, unaccountable authority comprised mostly of board members from outside Virginia, tolls of $10 or more each way on Braddock Road, Little River Turnpike and Route 50 to pay for trolleys on Columbia Pike and Route 7?

If the Board approves Phase 2 without waiting for most facts and figures such as ridership forecasts and economic impacts of toll increases on Dulles Corridor residents and businesses, then certain Supervisors should be recalled from office.

Reply

Kathy

10:02 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

I was told by the Fairfax County attorney's office that the county supervisors cannot be recalled. That was when I inquired a while back.

Kathy Kaplan

Reply

Burt Rosenberg

5:25 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

This vote by the Fairfax Board of Supervisors must NOT take place in such a rushed manner. The proposed funding is totally unacceptable, particularly because of the exorbitant, unconscionable tolls on theToll Road. We must not be a cash cow, sheep to be shorn, for this project. Go back to the drawing board, if necessary, but do not let this monstrosity pass as currently proposed.

Reply

Terry Maynard

10:26 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

For Reston 2020's last attempt to persuade the Board of the costs to toll road users of re-affirming their commitment to the current Phase 2 funding arrangement, see this:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwmHIwRgx6DTVjBNbzhqaXlTVml1WVlmMU1sV2dRQQ/edit

Reply

Leave a comment