The "American dream" is at stake in the November presidential election, said in a prime-time speech at the Republican National Convention Tuesday night.
"I don't have to tell any of you: this is a tough economy. We all have friends, family and neighbors who've lost their jobs and homes," McDonnell (R) said. "Worse, they've lost their hope. And their lost hope is why we need a big change this November. This election is about restoring the American dream."
Like many of the convention speeches Tuesday, McDonnell's address criticized a remark made by President Barack Obama (D) during a July campaign stop in Roanoke that Republicans say suggested business owners did not build their success on their own.
"We need a president who will say to a small businesswoman: congratulations, we applaud your success, you did make that happen, you did build that in America," McDonnell said to the crowd in Tampa, Fla. "Small businesses don't come out of Washington, D.C. pre-made on flatbed trucks.”
Obama was speaking about the role of government investment in infrastructure and businesses when he said, "If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
The statement, which some argue has been taken out of context in political advertisements and elsewhere, drew headlines and brought the president under fire from Republicans across the nation.
In his July speech, Obama continued: "The Internet didn't get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet, so then all the companies could make money off the Internet. The point is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together."
In his address at the convention, McDonnell also criticized the Obama administration's fiscal policy and inability to lower the unemployment rate.
"Republican governors lead seven of the 10 states with the lowest unemployment rates, and 12 of the 15 states ranked best for business have republican governors," he said. "While the president talks, Republican governors lead. Talk is cheap. Results matter."
McDonnell said Mitt Romney, who officially became the Republican candidate for president Tuesday, had experience managing a business and creating jobs.
"Now, just think what we can do if we had a president who would support us, and not obstruct us," McDonnell said. "We need President Mitt Romney!"
Obama's camp is already responding to McDonnell's address.
"It's hard to take Governor McDonnell's attacks on the President's policies seriously when he admitted recently that those same policies of cutting taxes for the middle class and small businesses, investing in infrastructure, and supporting education have helped strengthen Virginia's economy," said Marianne von Nordeck, Virginia press secretary at Obama for America, in a release late Tuesday night. "Under President Obama's leadership, our nation has gone from the brink of a second Great Depression to 29 consecutive months of private sector job growth, including over 120,000 jobs created right here in Virginia. The fact is that President Obama has put the middle class first, while Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan would return to the same, failed, trickle-down economic policies that crashed our economy in the first place."
Do you think the "American dream" is at stake this election? Tell us in the comments.
I find it odd that the state is going through the expense of issuing new Voter ID cards to all current registrants with proof that would have been unacceptable under the new law. If find it odd that you can use the absentee ballot without any proof of ID under the new law (therefore, under the old laws). It seems fairly easy to go into mailboxes and steal absentee ballots and commit voter fraud. Without a substantive reason that there is widespread voter fraud (singular problems here and there does not constitute an issue). And, given the numerous statements from the GOP that this law gives them the edge in the upcoming election is more indicative of the true motive behind these laws. To make voting more difficult for the majority because of less than a minority of cases is not what we do here. My grandmother who was born here, but at home in 1917 (she's 95 and bright as a whip) always voted. Now in an assisted living community without any utility bills, no drivers license or social security card (hasn't needed one in 30 years) - she cannot vote. The Sisters at the Church-run facility is having to jump through hoops to help out their residents. This is just a waste of time. Hopefully, all will still be able to exercise their rights, but not without a lot of effort. That is a sin.
You are right about the Dems having changed as well. The fringe has become the mainstream. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6b1VOAATNk
Here is another government website indicating that a military ID IS acceptable. If the poll would not accept your husband's military ID, you should protest it with the election board. It says NOTHING about an expiration date. http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/elections/a1voteridentificationchart2012.pdf As far as voter fraud, it is a problem. The main problem is that , like any type of fraud, it is hard to uncover because it is commited with a plan and deceit. The fact that a woman who is educated and politically minded as the nominee for Congress in Maryland, would commit it, indicates how easy it is to commit fraud. The Minnesota situation with the Franken vote is another example. We will never know the true results--and don't forget the votes that were found after the election in the trunk of an election official that he/she forgot about. Also, the situation in KS where 30 Somalians were aided by one official to vote--against the local laws. There are also examples in Texas and many,many others. Any fraudulent vote, negates someone else's legal vote--Republican or Democrat.
Anyway, don't engage them. It only encourages them. You'll not get any rational dialog. We're chipping in for tinfoil hat for him and his ilk. Do you think we should go double strength on the foil?
Our fellow Americans aren't blue or red, they're American first. And, the chatter right now is that Romney will not put country first. I fear for my friends overseas.
"The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others."
That's what I don't get. I'm all up for smaller gov't and less regulation. But having spent 15 years of my life in banking - oh, yeah, double down on those regs. I lived in the sausage factory and screwing the consumer is the goal. Why? Because we can. That whole SEC porn things was pathetic. Basic management and IT security should never ever have left that happen. What is it with you guys you can't live without the porn? (LOL!! JUST KIDDING and picking on the guys!). Efficiency seems elusive in business and gov't and a major ticking point with me. But to cut Obama a break - he's had some other issues going on that have required focused resources. PS: As a marketer - that hopey changey thing works. Of course, there is a % of the pop where fear messaging is better like the old "Do you understand the high cost of dying" insurance messaging use to be. But have found after 30 years, aspirational messaging is far more effective. That's why people buy their brand labels, big houses, and other crap. People buy hope. Well, at least 67% of them do!
So, to Cheryl's point, it was the demonizaton of Obama that evil is portrayed. Y'know, attack the other party on policy - but no on who has 'real families" or who "really gets America" as opposed to this mythic Manchurian politician that has been perpetrated. Hey, if it works for Don Joy, the medical leg brace moniker guy, great. But it does not play well with middle America - of either party. And, quite frankly, has turned many center right folk into the center left.
Did you ever wonder, too, that the only reason Madoff was prosecuted was because he robbed the ultra rich? LOl - I say it half jokingly. Part of me u/stands the Geittner appt (and just play with me to u/stand the other side) in that Geittner knew the tricks, had the relationships with the financial community and those skills were necessary to try to repair the banking industry. We could not (referencing my industry background) let faith in the banking industry fail because they (gov't de-reg, on both sides) let it grow so dang big. Keeping faith in the American financial system has global repercutions (sp?). Even now, all foreign countries are investing in US bonds simply because they are still the safest in the world, despite the downgrade. That is how bad it is right now. I wil remain patient, one step at a time. The best thing I can counsel as I do to everyone, is vote with your wallet. Do not continue to do business with firms whose practices you disagree with. ie: if you've got a BoA account, get your money out. Go USAA if you can. Hurt business where it counts, in their sales numbers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6b1VOAATNk The looney tunes are on both sides. I personally was jazzed about the tea party movement in its inception, I thought Santelli's call for it was fantastic. http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=1039849853 and grew more supportive as a result of the blatant bias associated with it. Aired portion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2baxw_YScxc Not aired portion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zNbWtl4wgM But when the tea party movement became more involved with Koch fueled backing, and we got John Boehner (eww, but not as revolting as Pelosi) I became less impressed. While a Paul supporter at heart (not everything, like foreign policy seems wanting) I just don't see anything that Obama has to offer. While not 100% jazzed about the GOP offering, I do like Paul Ryan's fiscal ethos. Sadly, both parties have magnificently come together to make things next to impossible for another Perot or Nader as an option. It's amazing, they claim "polarization" and "division" yet come together to hold hands in joy to maintain their dual party system we are bounded to.
However, I do believe the GOP is in the (using a term from business) throws of 'creative destruction'. From that will either emerge a different GOP or a third party. Though I do think the Libertarian party and Social Conservative parties are most definitely there, just not much in numbers. Do I think those numbers will grow? Not likely, solely based on my experience in consumer behavior. However, that does not say the Libertarian or other parties become irrelevant, they have an influence. Which is just as important.
As long as we all agree we keep the bat s**t crazies OUT. OMG. They've been flying out of the rafters of late!
Biden: "General Motors is alive and Osama bin Laden is dead......and so is Ambassador Christopher Stevens"! 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKCwQnIygcw 2. Apologies: http://weaselzippers.us/2012/09/12/allen-west-shreds-obama-over-libya-killings-says-his-appeasement-towards-the-islamic-world-has-manifested-itself-into-unconscionable-hatred/ 3. Rules of Engagement policy by Barack Obama on Muslims: Rubber bullets at our embassy in Tunisa. How would you like your son to have rubber bullets defending sovereign territory? http://weaselzippers.us/2012/09/12/breaking-tunisians-protesting-mohammed-movie-attempt-to-storm-u-s-embassy-police-fire-tea-gas-and-rubber-bullets-to-disperse-protesters/ 4. The apology tour: http://madisonproject.com/2012/09/obama-apologizes-to-islamists-on-september-11/
Would you prefer double strength tinfoil for your hat? Buh buh